Snape and Dumbledore
I was trying to say something very brief about Snape in an IM, but it became massive. Amber expertly observes, “stuff involving him goes that way I think.”
You get to thinking about just how sympathetic Snape was in the end, how difficult the decisions he had to make were and how cruelly he was treated, but that eventually brings you to a deeper understanding of his still, in spite of all that, having been an awful, arrogant person with evil beliefs.
He really couldn’t help developing that dichotomous personality. Being troubled already, he let himself be defined early on by James on the one hand and Lily on the other, and maybe he could have let that go later in life when they married and had a kid, but wow did it ever not work out like that. It’s not a revolutionary observation, just a more complicated way of saying what’s obvious, but his relationships with James and Lily form a Hegelian dialectic, the synthesis of which being his schizo approach to Harry Potter. Snape carries on a schoolyard grudge through his long dead enemy’s orphaned 11 year old son, but spends immense effort, making the largest possible sacrifices, for the same boy.
Which of course was engineered by Dumbledore. Dumbledore is Snape inverted: he really was warm and insightful, but not just insightful, there was ruthless, stony calculation, willingness to ask agonizing sacrifices of anyone he could leverage into making them, and even, it would appear, intricate, willful manipulation of the people who trusted him. To me, it’s only his *need* for Harry Potter, and the vastness of what he knew he’d one day expect Harry to do, that explains and excuses the constant nepotism. When you’re gonna ask a seventeen year old boy to literally, definitely die for you, you goddamn well better try to do something nice for him first.
The crucial revelation about Snape also serves as a microcosm of him. When he becomes a redoubled agent for Dumbledore, he didn’t suddenly see the light and change his ways, he went against his own beliefs to protect Lily Potter.
Dumbledore’s response when Snape goes to him is telling too. I had to look this one up. Snape begs Dumbledore to keep the Potters safe, and Dumbledore says “and what will you give me in return, Severus?” Reasonable, he’s talking to an enemy agent, but not the words of a friendly headmaster so much as a tactician fighting a losing battle.
I love Snape and Dumbledore for being such adults, and for not developing into those roles so much as occupying them from the start, waiting to reveal that depth as Harry Potter becomes able to recognize it. The level of complexity in their portrayal is tied to how much of them Harry can figure out, but the bare facts of their actions, removed from Harry Potter’s emotions and interpretations thereof, shows such complexity.
The very short thing I meant to say was that even though the last book’s revelations about Snape are redeeming, they crucially don’t erase what’s been bad about him all through Harry’s years at Hogwarts. The revelations add to him, showing why he did some of the things he did while leaving the cruel pettiness of others intact. They don’t overwrite him. I think that’s an extremely good thing. The counterpart revelations about Dumbledore do something different, causing everything you’ve seen the character do to shift unnervingly. But crucially, it only makes the things that were familiar and endearing about him muddy and complicated, never fully invalidating them. He really did care about the people he appeared to care about, and many more people, which is precisely the motivation behind his Machiavellian calculations.
The same way thinking about Snape’s positive traits makes me circle back around to his flaws, Dumbledore’s secrets lead back to what made him a good man. A thirst for knowledge is one of the first things Harry Potter learned from (and about) Albus Dumbledore, and it comes back to the surface during their postmortem conversation in the form of a question. Referring to his effort to gain power by collecting the Deathly Hallows with Gillert Grindlewald, he asks Harry if he was ultimately any better than Voldemort. It showed the wholeness of Dumbledore’s regret and contrition, but it also showed him to be seeking understanding. 115 years old and dead, Dumbledore still wanted to know more fully the impact of his own actions.



Met my girlfriend at a Harry Potter convention.
Oh, I attend Harry Potter conventions.
That’s a thing I do.
Holy crap! You have a g- no, too easy. Hang on. I’ll get back to you on this.
Okay, okay, got one! …nah, if that’s a true story you’ve probably covered all possible robe and wizard hat jokes. Fuck. Stand by.
Those places have a pretty chill vibe about them that you can’t really find at any other sort of convention. Other cons have too much underlying “MY NERD THING IS BETTER THAN YOUR NERD THING” rage bubbling just under the surface.
Spending four days where you can just leave your hotel room and enter the hotel–or a conference hall–or a major theme park–and being absolutely guaranteed to see twenty to a thousand weirdos in robes or Hufflepuff ties who are there for the EXACT SAME REASON you are is a pretty rad experience, all things considered.
Plus, the male-to-female ratio is about 20:1. You take out the guys whose girlfriends made them come and the guys who are more interested in other guys and it’s probably in the neighborhood of 50:1.
The odds were in my favor, you see. Single straight dude may as well be the last surviving white tiger which has had twenty winning lottery tickets glued to its’ face.
I ended up–as I often do–watching the Science Channel at about 4 AM and saw this show: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuck_with_Hackett
It’s odd, this guy is basically my exact mental image of you. If you had a masters degree in mechanical engineering, instead of an overwhelming desire to cook things.
It’s basically some dude who goes to abandoned places and builds shit out of nothing, vaguely post-apocalyptic, but it’s mostly his general personality and “this thing I rigged together out of plastic bottles and train parts could easily blow my face off, but I do not care in the slightest, and will actively mock this fact while desperately attempting to turn it on”-vibe that reminds me of you specifically.
He also licked asbestos that he found, so, there’s that?
HAH! I think that’s one of the nicest compliments I’ve ever been given.
I love that he calls the crap he builds better crap out of “obtanium.”
I actually found the “obtanium” thing a little annoying, but you can tell it’s just how he is, rather than some awful gimmick a TV producer forced on him or whatever.
I only went to Wikipedia in the first place to make sure that actually WAS the first episode–in the first forty seconds of the first goddamn episode, he says “obtanium” about seventy-four times. I thought there was some explanation I was missing from a prior episode–even though what he meant was obvious from context–I just found it odd that some madman on my TV was spouting out gibberish-words in the first minute of his new TV show like everyone should immediately recognize them.
Yeah, I can see that getting annoying with overuse. Could be an editing/marketing thing: push the cute invented word the show’s premise hinges on as hard as possible in the first quarter of episode 1, and it’ll stick in everyone’s heads (plus dopey viewers will have a better chance of getting it from context clues.)
Alright, so I saw a weird cake on your Twitter and it compelled me to actually watch an episode of Adventure Time.
I was sold at LORD MONOCHROMICORN
Is this the kinda thing I should watch from the beginning or just have my DVR pick up random episodes in a random order as they show reruns?